2024

Analyzing the intrastate and interstate swine movement network in the United States

Nicolas C. Cardenas a , Arthur Valencio a , Felipe Sanchez a,b , Kathleen C. O’Hara c , Gustavo Machado a,b

a Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
b Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
c US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Analyzing the intrastate and interstate swine movement network in the United States

Identifying and restricting animal movements is a common approach used to mitigate the spread of diseases between premises in livestock systems. Therefore, it is essential to uncover between-premises movement dynamics, including shipment distances and network-based control strategies. Here, we analyzed three years of between-premises pig movements, which include 197,022 unique animal shipments, 3973 premises, and 391,625,374 pigs shipped across 20 U.S. states. We constructed unweighted, directed, temporal networks at 180-day intervals to calculate premises-to-premises movement distances, the size of connected components, network loyalty, and degree distributions, and, based on the out-going contact chains, identified network-based control actions. Our results show that the median distance between premises pig movements was 74.37 km, with median intrastate and interstate movements of 52.71 km and 328.76 km, respectively. On average, 2842 premises were connected via 6705 edges, resulting in a weak giant connected component that included 91% of the premises. The premises-level network exhibited loyalty, with a median of 0.65 (IQR: 0.45 – 0.77). Results highlight the effectiveness of node targeting to reduce the risk of disease spread; we demonstrated that targeting 25% of farms with the highest degree or betweenness limited spread to 1.23% and 1.7% of premises, respectively. While there is no complete shipment data for the entire U.S., our multi-state movement analysis demonstrated the value and the needs of such data for enhancing the design and implementation of proactive disease control tactics.

Keywords:

Pig movement
Multistate animal transportation
Contact chain
Swine network

Related articles

Vehicle movements analysis and risk associated with PRRS and PED infection in the U.S. swine farms

Jason A. Galvis, Gustavo Machado

Learn more

Modeling the impact of multiple transmission routes of African swine fever in a barn

Aniruddha Deka, Jason A. Galvis, Christian Fleming, Maryam Safari, Chi-An Yeh, Gustavo Machado

Learn more

Early detection of ASF: comparing sampling strategies in growing pig farms

Jason A. Galvis, Aniruddha Deka, Gustavo Machado

Learn more

Vehicle movements analysis and risk associated with PRRS and PED infection in the U.S. swine farms

Jason A. Galvis, Gustavo Machado

Learn more

Modeling the impact of multiple transmission routes of African swine fever in a barn

Aniruddha Deka, Jason A. Galvis, Christian Fleming, Maryam Safari, Chi-An Yeh, Gustavo Machado

Learn more

Early detection of ASF: comparing sampling strategies in growing pig farms

Jason A. Galvis, Aniruddha Deka, Gustavo Machado

Learn more